Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 August 20

< August 19	August 21 >

August 20

File:BetaRayBill90sSilverSurfer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--image is not discussed critically and we already have one non-free piece of media to identify the character. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TSB logo 2013.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superceded in use by vector version. Cloudbound (talk) 18:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walking bass I-V.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete: replaced the sole instance with wiki text for music 192.189.192.100 (talk) 19:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons just because we maintain such things in Wikimarkup does not mean that every wikipedia is so competent as to be able to. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bachelor-GiaAllemand.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Deleted by Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

As a model there will be lots of pictures of this person, the fact she died less than a week ago is not a free pass on the WP:NFCC #1; no evidence her agent or family has been asked to release a free image. Likely given this images wide use in the press it is also taken form a a commercial image agency. LGA _talk^edits 20:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it, the girl is dead no free image avaiable. 189.122.20.218 (talk) 19:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lee thompson young.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There will be lots of pictures of this person, the fact he died less than 24hrs ago is not a free pass on the WP:NFCC #1; no evidence his agent or family has been asked to release a free image. Likely given this images wide use in the press it is also taken form a a commercial image agency. LGA _talk^edits 20:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I do a lot of searching for "free-images" to import to wikimedia and use on articles and believe me, its impossible to get any "free" (rightly licensed) image of Lee Thompson for use on wikipedia, if we can properly licence this image, I hope it remains as his headshot in his article..--Stemoc (talk) 03:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you have contacted his agent and asked for one ? LGA _talk^edits 03:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, It doesn't work that way and his agents name isn't available..and that image is widely used so hrd to pinpoint who owns the copyright information (if any)...--Stemoc (talk) 04:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but WP editors not being able to find one on google does not equate to "no free equivalent is available" and I have done a very quick google and have discovered the name of his agent. Without some evidence of a attempt to obtain a free equivalent form the obvious non-online sources the use of this image still fails WP:NFCC #1. LGA _talk^edits 07:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well find me a "free" image and I will upload it myself...Yes his agent is Sheree Cohen and she represents over 30 stars and even if i was able to contact her, Its highly unlikely she will be able to provide me with a "freely-licensed" image as talent agents are not necessarily their publicist and until someone does that, I hope this image stays and the uploadee tries to get the licensing info, its currently under the right guideline...--Stemoc (talk) 08:08, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the agent cant they will in all like hood be able to point you in the direction of someone who might be able to. The WP:BURDEN is not with me to find a free one, I have demonstrated that a reasonable search has not been done and therefore this should be removed. LGA _talk^edits 09:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given the photo credit here I am also nominating it F7 :Non-free images or media from a commercial source as it is sourced to the commercial image provider WENN. LGA _talk^edits 09:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Okanogan County Superior Court No. 13-2-00234-7 Deposition Highlights.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be out of scope. Licence is wrong, although I'd guess that {{PD-laws}} applies. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Okanogan County Superior Court Cause No. 13-2-00234-7.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be out of scope. Licence is wrong, although I'd guess that {{PD-laws}} applies. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.